Unifying Qualities in Romantic Art

     Romanticism is such complex and diverse artistic movement that one cannot discern a singular definitive quality (Viault, 1990). Eric Newton (1962) claimed that critics have been unable to establish a common factor in Romantic art. To be sure, there was no singular, universal approach (Linduff, Schultz, and Wilkins, 2005). The range of subjects was too diverse to be definitive (Galitz, 2004). The artwork itself varied stylistically and regionally (Wikipedia, 2012). In the lack of one clear common factor, Romanticism is classified by its ideologies (Galitz, 2004). According to Linduff, et al. (2005), Romanticism is an attitude of mind. It stressed the subjective view of the artist (Linduff, et al., 2005), and those artists rejected the rules placed upon them by previous art movements (Wikipedia, 2012).

     With all the complexity and variety in Romantic art, how does one go about classifying that art as such? What is it that brought those artists, independent and rebellious as they were, together under one movement? What were the unifying qualities of Romanticism?

Dedham Mill by John Constable, 1820 
Make a Free Website with Yola.